萝莉原创

萝莉原创

22 December 2024

Related Information

Acquisitions help Octavius grow 28%

15 Oct Accounts filed by Octavius Infrastructure Ltd show turnover up 28% last year and pre-tax profit up by 20%.

Octavius Infrastructure chief executive John Dowsett
Octavius Infrastructure chief executive John Dowsett

鈥淚t has been a very successful year for the group,鈥 chief executive John Dowsett writes in the 2024 annual report of Octavius Infrastructure.

This puts the company into stark contrast with its former parent company, Geoffrey Osborne Limited, which limped through the past couple of years before collapsing into administration in April this year.

In the year to 31st March 2024 Octavius Infrastructure grew turnover grew by 28% to 拢276.7m (2023: 拢215.4m) thanks to both organic growth and two acquisitions.

Pre-tax profit was up 20% to 拢4.7m (2023: 拢3.9m), including 拢2.0m of exceptional items relating to the cost of integrating acquisitions.

Roughly a third of the revenue growth was down to a pair of acquisitions 鈥 拢21.3m out of the 拢61m increase.

In July 2023 Octavius Infrastructure acquired the assets of Southampton-based R&W Civil Engineering in July 2023 out of administration for 拢485,000. [See previous report here.]

Related Information

R&W added 拢18.8m to Octavius turnover in the latest financial year, at an operating loss of 拢780,000.

Octavius also paid 拢6.8m in December 2023 for Navitas Engineering, a specialist rail electrification design consultancy. Navitas added 拢2.5m turnover during the final three months of the year and 拢332,000 profit.

Group employee numbers grew during the financial year from 456 to 598;聽 employee costs rose from 拢29m to 拢41m.

Private equity investors led by Sullivan Street Partners acquired Osborne Infrastructure from family owned Geoffrey Osborne Ltd in September 2021. In March 2022 it was rebranded as Octavius Infrastructure.

The owners hope to double the size of the business over five years. The challenge, Octavius chief executive John Dowsett writes in the annual report, is 鈥渢hat we need to both bid and win a greater volume of contracts, whilst also taking on larger and more complex projects. There is a balance to be struck to optimise the value of work versus the price tendered. Under-pricing work risks reduced contract profitability, whereas over-pricing may lead to lower volume of work won. Additionally, complexity of customer tender requirements is increasing, putting further strain on the ability of the team to deliver bids of the right quality, at the right price, in the desired volumes.鈥

Got a story? Email news@theconstructionindex.co.uk

MPU

Click here to view latest construction news »